All posts tagged: Apple Lawsuits

Apple Sued for Pulling Co-Viewing App Rave From the App Store

Apple Sued for Pulling Co-Viewing App Rave From the App Store

Published by skeptic

Rave, a cross-platform service that lets users watch movies and TV shows together, today filed a series of antitrust lawsuits against Apple after Apple removed the Rave app from the App Store in August 2025. According to Rave, Apple cited “unspecified allegations of fraud and vague concerns about content moderation” when pulling the app. Rave alleges Apple targeted the service because Rave competed with SharePlay, and Apple wanted to corner the market on smartphone co-viewing. Rave claims that Apple also falsely labeled the Rave Mac app as malware, preventing Mac users from installing it. Discussion on Reddit suggests that Rave had unmoderated public chatrooms, pornography, issues with scams, and CSAM material. The Rave app was also labeled as malware by Kaspersky, BitDefender, Windows, and Google, suggesting Apple may have had reason to protect users from the app beyond limiting competition. Apple has not yet commented on the lawsuit or the app’s removal. Rave claims that it has now created “industry-leading” content moderation and age verification technologies, presumably to preempt Apple’s content moderation criticism. Rave was …

Apple to Pay 0 Million to Settle Class Action Over Delayed Siri Features

Apple to Pay $250 Million to Settle Class Action Over Delayed Siri Features

Published by skeptic

Apple will pay $250 million to settle a class action lawsuit accusing it of false advertising and unfair competition after the personalized Siri features it promoted when launching the iPhone 16 were delayed. A smarter, Apple Intelligence version of ‌Siri‌ was shown off at WWDC 2024, and then promoted in ads and videos when the ‌iPhone 16‌ launched in September 2024. After Apple delayed the Siri Apple Intelligence features in March 2025, Apple pulled its ads, but they had been running for several months at that point. The lawsuit claimed Apple violated consumer law by misleading consumers about the actual utility and performance of ‌Apple Intelligence‌, and causing them to purchase a device “with features that did not exist or were materially misrepresented.” Apple was not found guilty of any wrongdoing, and the company sometimes settles lawsuits to minimize legal fees and time spent on litigation. A settlement agreement was reached back in December, but the terms of the settlement are now live. In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said that resolved the lawsuit so …

Apple Asks Supreme Court to Pause Epic Games Case Ahead of App Store Fee Ruling

Apple Asks Supreme Court to Pause Epic Games Case Ahead of App Store Fee Ruling

Published by skeptic

Apple today filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court, asking for a stay on App Store fee calculations while it waits to hear whether the Supreme Court will weigh in on the latest developments in its legal battle with Epic Games. Apple argues that without a stay, it will face irreparable harm. Apple says it will have to litigate the fundamentals of its business model with the “highly prejudicial taint of being (improperly) found to have acted in contempt of the court’s initial order” with the world watching, plus the case would require it to disclose confidential business information, which can’t be undone. Regulators around the world are watching this case to determine what commission rate Apple may charge on covered purchases in huge markets outside the United States. No proceeding setting the commission Apple may charge–an endeavor that itself is fraught with challenges and raises the prospect of the courts engaging in improper rate-setting–should be allowed to unfold under the false and prejudicial auspices that Apple acted in contempt by charging a commission …

Apple Faces Dozens of Lawsuits Over AirTag Stalking After Class Action Denied

Apple Faces Dozens of Lawsuits Over AirTag Stalking After Class Action Denied

Published by skeptic

Apple is facing over 30 lawsuits from people who claim to have been stalked using Apple AirTags. The filings come after an AirTag lawsuit from 2022 (Hughes v. Apple) failed to get class certification. In each filing, Apple is accused of releasing the ‌AirTag‌ while being aware that it could be “purchased and used by abusive, dangerous individuals, to track, coerce, control, and otherwise endanger and abuse innocent victims.” Further, the lawsuits say that Apple knew adequate safeguards were not in place when the ‌AirTag‌ launched in 2021, and Apple is aware that “AirTags remain a profound risk” to people like the plaintiffs. Apple reportedly received more than 40,000 stalking reports between April 2021 and April 2024, and Apple internal documents sourced from the original lawsuit show the company knew its safeguards would only “deter as opposed to prevent malicious use.” The company also acknowledged that it “should have consulted domestic abuse organizations on the unwanted tracking policy before shipping.” Multiple news reports of AirTags being used for stalking are referenced, including cases that ended …

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Published by skeptic

Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ’s ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple’s bid to have the case dismissed failed, the litigation moved into discovery. Samsung is central to the case. All four complaints identify Samsung as Apple’s “closest smartphone competitor,” and plaintiffs allege that Apple’s conduct caused Samsung to stop making smartwatches that connect to iPhone in 2021. Apple subpoenaed Samsung’s U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Electronics America, for documents, but the subsidiary declined to produce any records, arguing the materials are held solely by its South Korean parent. Apple says Samsung America lodged that objection 65 times across its responses. In a memorandum filed on April 7, Apple asked the court to issue a formal letter of request under the Hague Evidence Convention, an international mechanism …

Apple Asks Supreme Court to Pause Epic Games Case Ahead of App Store Fee Ruling

Apple Asks Court to Pause App Store Fee Fight While It Petitions Supreme Court in Epic Games Case

Published by skeptic

Apple plans to ask the United States Supreme Court to weigh in on the App Store fee restrictions and contempt of court ruling levied against it in the ongoing Epic Games vs. Apple legal battle. In a filing on April 3 (via TechCrunch), Apple asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hold off on a plan that would see the U.S. Northern District of California decide on a reasonable commission for Apple to charge developers for purchases made from a link in an app. Apple is concerned that the district court will decide on a fee, only to have the Supreme Court then reverse the ruling in its entirety. Apple says that it does not want to make multiple major changes to its ‌App Store‌ fee structure. Instead, Apple proposes that the current no-commission setup remain in place until Apple hears back from the Supreme Court. Developers can currently include links to non-App Store purchase options in their apps and Apple charges no fee from purchases made using those links. Apple wants to continue …

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels

Published by skeptic

Three established YouTube channels have sued Apple, alleging that the company violated the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by unlawfully accessing and scraping millions of copyrighted videos from YouTube to train its AI models. In a class action lawsuit filed in California federal court last week, the owners of the YouTube channels h3h3Productions (plus H3 Podcast and H3 Podcast Highlights), MrShortGame Golf, and Golfholics allege that Apple “deliberately circumvented” YouTube’s protections against video scraping and “profited substantially” by doing so. Apple’s research papers indicate that some of the YouTube videos uploaded by the plaintiffs were used to train its AI models, the complaint alleges. Apple’s actions were “not only unlawful, but an unconscionable attack on the community of content creators whose content is used to fuel the multi-trillion-dollar generative AI industry without any compensation,” the lawsuit adds. The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction and damages individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated in the U.S., per the complaint. In recent months, the same three YouTube channels have filed similar lawsuits against other …

Apple Wanted to Buy Halide to Boost iPhone 18 Pro’s Camera App—Now There’s a Lawsuit

Apple Wanted to Buy Halide to Boost iPhone 18 Pro’s Camera App—Now There’s a Lawsuit

Published by skeptic

Apple’s plans to enhance the iPhone 18 Pro’s Camera app led it to consider acquiring Halide, but the talks ultimately collapsed and were followed by a fierce legal dispute between the startup’s co-founders, according to The Information reports. In the summer of 2025, Apple reportedly held discussions to acquire Lux Optics, the developer behind the popular iPhone camera apps Halide, Kino, and Spectre. The company concluded that it could get a better offer from Apple in the future following updates to the app. Two months after the talks concluded without a deal, Apple set about recruiting Lux’s co-founder and designer Sebastian de With. Lux CEO and co-founder Ben Sandofsky is said to have fired de With in December over financial misconduct. de With announced that he had joined Apple’s design team in January. Sandofsky has now filed a lawsuit in the California Superior Court of Santa Cruz against de With, accusing him of improperly using more than $150,000 in Lux company funds to pay for personal expenses since 2022, as well as providing confidential material …

ITC Judge Rules Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Workaround Does Not Infringe Masimo Patents

ITC Judge Rules Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Workaround Does Not Infringe Masimo Patents

Published by skeptic

Apple’s current blood oxygen sensing implementation in the U.S. does not infringe on patents owned by Masimo and Apple will not face a revived import ban, a U.S. International Trade Commission judge said this week (via Reuters). After Apple was found to have violated Masimo’s patents related to blood oxygen sensing, the Apple Watch faced a U.S. import ban that caused Apple to briefly pause sales of the device in December 2023 before Apple earned a temporary stay. Apple disabled blood oxygen sensing in January 2024, and was able to resume selling the Apple Watch without the functionality. In August 2025, Apple found a workaround and was able to bring blood oxygen sensing back to U.S. Apple Watch owners. Data is collected by the blood oxygen sensor on the Apple Watch, but it is processed on a paired iPhone rather than the watch itself, and the resulting information can only be viewed on the iPhone. Apple said the updated process did not violate the ITC ban, or infringe on Masimo’s patents, and it was cleared …

Apple Asks Judge to Toss Fraud Claims Over Siri AI, Epic Compliance

Apple Asks Judge to Toss Fraud Claims Over Siri AI, Epic Compliance

Published by skeptic

Apple has asked a federal judge to dismiss a proposed class action lawsuit accusing the company of defrauding shareholders by overstating Siri’s Apple Intelligence capabilities and misrepresenting its compliance with the Epic Games App Store injunction. At WWDC in June 2024, Apple previewed two of Siri’s most anticipated Apple Intelligence upgrades – personal context and onscreen awareness. The features were supposed to arrive as part of iOS 18 and were promoted the same year when launching the iPhone 16 models, but Apple is still working on them. In 2025, CEO Tim Cook acknowledged in 2025 that developing a “more personal” Siri was “taking a bit longer than we thought.” The delay led Apple to be accused in a March 2025 lawsuit of false advertising and unfair competition. But in a Wednesday filing in San Jose federal court covered by Reuters, Apple argued there is no proof executives knew at the time that either feature would be significantly delayed. Apple’s motion also pushed back on separate claims related to the Epic Games injunction, which required the …