Rutherford Chang Rewrotes What a Square Could Do
Art history has been punctuated by debates over what a square can mean or do. For Kazimir Malevich, the black square was, in a sense, painting’s building block—a way to strip art down to its most fundamental form. For Ad Reinhardt, it marked an endpoint: He described his black canvases as the last paintings that could be made, as though abstraction had reached its logical conclusion. Of course, his was not the final word. Josef Albers continued the inquiry, nesting colorful quadrilaterals in his “Homage to the Square” series to reveal unexpected interactions of color and the ways they generate depth and space. Related Articles Rutherford Chang took this conversation a step further in the 21st century. His work, which was recently on view in a survey at UCCA Center for Contemporary Art Beijing, centers on squares—but his are not abstract. Rather, they are insistently social. Chang—who died last year at the age of 45—undermines the cool detachment so often associated with the form: its equal sides, its 90-degree angles. View of the exhibition “Rutherford …



