All posts tagged: consistently

People consistently underestimate how often things go wrong across society

People consistently underestimate how often things go wrong across society

People systematically underestimate how often things go wrong in the world—a bias researchers call the “failure gap.” This mega-project was published in the Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. We rely on perceptions of how common events are when forming opinions, making decisions, and supporting policies. Prior research shows that these perceptions are often biased. Much of the literature has focused on optimism; for example, people tend to believe good outcomes are more likely and bad outcomes less likely, especially when those outcomes affect them. However, does this tendency extend beyond personal life to broader societal issues, such as crime, health, or economic failures? Lauren Eskreis-Winkler and colleagues examined this broader question, asking whether people misjudge how often failures occur across many domains of life. They proposed that the issue may not just be optimism, but the way information is shared: failures are less frequently discussed than successes because they are uncomfortable, embarrassing, or socially costly to communicate. As a result, people may develop systematically skewed impressions of reality because they are exposed to incomplete …

People consistently devalue creative writing generated by artificial intelligence

People consistently devalue creative writing generated by artificial intelligence

A recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General suggests that people consistently judge creative writing more harshly if they believe it was created by artificial intelligence. This bias appears incredibly difficult to overcome, pointing to a persistent human preference for art created by people. Generative artificial intelligence refers to computer programs capable of producing new text, images, or music by predicting patterns from massive amounts of data. Tools like ChatGPT and Claude can now write essays, poems, and stories that read very much like they were written by a real person. As these technologies become more common, scientists wanted to understand how people react to computer-generated art. “We started this project in early 2023, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT. From my early interactions with the technology, it was clear to me that this tool was capable of creative production, and I was very curious about whether and how humans would react to AI-produced creative goods,” explained study author Manav Raj, an assistant professor in management at the Wharton School of the …

Artificial intelligence struggles to consistently evaluate scientific facts

Artificial intelligence struggles to consistently evaluate scientific facts

Generative artificial intelligence programs can write fluently, but they still struggle to accurately and consistently evaluate basic scientific statements. A recent study shows that when an artificial intelligence is asked the exact same question multiple times, it often gives completely different answers. These results, published in the Rutgers Business Review, highlight the limits of current automated reasoning and the ongoing need for human oversight. Generative artificial intelligence is a type of technology trained on massive databases of text to produce human-like writing. Millions of people now use these applications daily for tasks ranging from marketing to software development. The software writes with an authoritative tone that often sounds correct even when it is entirely wrong. Some high-profile consulting firms have even faced public embarrassment after relying on automated reports that included fabricated data. Despite these known flaws, many businesses have partnered with technology vendors to incorporate these tools into their daily operations. Professionals frequently rely on automated software to analyze data, answer customer queries, and summarize research. The researchers wanted to know if the logical …

Do These 2 Things Consistently and Get Along With Anyone

Do These 2 Things Consistently and Get Along With Anyone

Getting along with others in almost all situations requires two basic patterns of behavior: Always be kind and always tell the truth. If you do this consistently, you will get along well in almost any relationship. For some people, this is natural to them, and they do it without thought or effort. Individuals who struggle to get along with others often do so because they do not behave this way consistently. Understanding the obstacles to these behavior patterns and becoming consistent in these behavior patterns can be socially transformative. Almost everyone knows how to be kind to others when conditions are favorable. The benefits of being nice to others can only be reaped when the behavior is consistent. Some struggle to be kind to others when conflicts arise, when they are frustrated, or when they do not feel well. Learning how to be kind to others under these circumstances is essential to quality relationships. Transactional Relationships Treating others kindly in some circumstances and unkindly in others, depending on the circumstances, is transactional. It destabilizes the …

New psychology study reveals we consistently underestimate our power in close relationships

New psychology study reveals we consistently underestimate our power in close relationships

A new study published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin suggests that people consistently underestimate how much influence they have over their romantic partners and friends. This misperception tends to be stronger in individuals who are highly focused on protecting themselves or maintaining control, which provides evidence that personal insecurities shape how we view our close relationships. By recognizing this hidden influence, individuals might find healthier ways to communicate and resolve conflicts with their loved ones. In psychological research, power is defined as the perceived ability to steer mutual decisions and get personal needs met, rather than simply dominating another person. Previous research indicates that people who feel powerless often hide their true needs, experience lower overall well-being, and sometimes act aggressively to regain a sense of control. It was previously unclear if these negative outcomes happen because people actually lack influence or because they mistakenly believe they are powerless. The researchers wanted to test the idea that individuals might systematically underestimate their power to avoid making costly social mistakes. This concept is based …

People consistently overestimate the social backlash of changing their political beliefs, new psychology research shows

People consistently overestimate the social backlash of changing their political beliefs, new psychology research shows

A recent study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology suggests that people consistently overestimate how much their political peers will judge them for changing their minds on polarizing issues. This inflated fear of rejection tends to make individuals hide their shifting views, which deprives the public discourse of diverse perspectives. The research provides evidence that the social penalty for political dissent within one’s own party is generally much milder than expected. In highly polarized environments, people often treat political beliefs as strict markers of group loyalty. When an individual’s opinion evolves on a divisive topic like gun control or immigration, they face a difficult choice. They can voice their new perspective and risk being ostracized, or they can stay silent to protect their social standing. Because humans have a deep, evolutionary need to belong to groups, they are highly sensitive to the threat of social rejection. This sensitivity could lead individuals to adopt a “better safe than sorry” mindset, causing them to expect a much harsher backlash than they will actually experience. …