There are huge questions hanging over the Trump administration’s strategic objectives in Iran, especially now that a tentative ceasefire has hit immediate turbulence. Global relief on Tuesday evening, when President Trump backed off his ominous threat to lay waste to Iranian “civilization,” gave way to uncertainty and confusion Wednesday. A key figure in Tehran, the… Source link
Domestically and internationally, the effects of the war will felt for years to come. The US president has stepped back from the brink. After calling for the destruction of an entire civilisation, it appears Donald Trump is in the mood for peace. Recommended Stories list of 4 itemsend of list He has confirmed that Israel and the United States will stop attacking Iran for two weeks. And while it’s not clear if the agreement will lead to lasting peace, what is certain is that the US – and the world stage – have been changed. So how has the US been shaped by Trump’s war on Iran? How has the world order? And can any of it be walked back? Presenter: James Bays Guests: Sanam Vakil – Director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at Chatham House Robert Pape – Professor of political science at the University of Chicago Kim Wehle – Professor of constitutional law at the University of Baltimore Law School Published On 8 Apr 20268 Apr 2026 Click here to …
IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Customer throws cocaine back at seller as police arrive 00:15 Pink tutus appear on statues across parks in Alabama 00:13 Suspect leads police on chase in stolen Bud Light truck 00:17 Hegseth lifts Army crew suspension over Kid Rock flyover 00:23 King Charles III will make state visit to U.S. in April 00:18 U.S. journalist taken by possible Iranian-backed militia 00:52 Video shows Michigan woman escaping through cop car window 01:05 Trump to attend Supreme Court hearing on citizenship 01:22 Windsurfer crashes into whale in San Francisco Bay 00:15 What value does the U.S. see in a return to the moon? 01:46 Now Playing Pope Leo urges Trump to find ‘off-ramp’ from Iran war 00:42 UP NEXT Judge blocks demolition of White House for new ballroom 00:27 Boston schools requiring AI proficiency to graduate 00:45 Pandas seen flirting is a sign of spring, D.C. zoo says 00:20 Israeli airstrike destroys Beirut building 00:30 Attorneys for Kirk shooting suspect question evidence …
The overnight Wall Street Journal report that President Trump told aides he is willing to wind down the U.S. military campaign against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted (and appeared to confirm this narrative in a social media post this morning) comes just as the national average gasoline price hit the politically sensitive $4-a-gallon threshold, underscoring the delicate balancing act the administration is facing in managing battlefield objectives and domestic fuel costs. The latest AAA data shows gasoline prices nationwide topped $4 a gallon on Monday, a 35% increase for Regular 87 at the pump and the largest price shock on record dating back to 2004. Regular 87 gasoline prices at the pump nationwide have returned to the price shock levels seen during the 2022 Russia-Ukraine crisis. Largest monthly price shock on record. Early last week, Bonnie Herzog, managing director and senior consumer analyst at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note that when fuel prices spike to these “psychological threshold” levels, above $3 and approaching $4 a gallon, consumers tend to drive …
President Donald Trump said he wanted to take Iran’s oil and suggested US troops could seize the country’s Kharg Island export hub, even as he added in comments published on March 30 that a deal with Tehran to end the war “could be made fairly quickly.” The buildup has since been confirmed by the New York Times, who says hundreds of commandos have arrived in the Middle East. Iran has dismissed the talks, saying they were a cover to get more US troops in the area. FRANCE 24’s Douglas Herbert tells us more. Keywords for this article Source link
The window for Donald Trump to end the Iran war by simply declaring victory and walking away is rapidly closing. Soon he will face a stark choice: He can take greater risks in pursuit of a decisive tactical success, prepare the country for a prolonged conflict that could last for many months, or seek a negotiated settlement that involves a real compromise with Tehran. Initially, Trump saw his Venezuela operation as the template for Iran. He imagined that he would make a deal with someone inside the regime who would work pragmatically with him and maybe cut the United States in on the oil. But the Islamic Republic proved more aggressive and more resilient than he had anticipated. By his own admission, no one in his administration had expected Iran to strike out against American allies in the region—“they weren’t supposed to go after all these other countries in the Middle East”—although it had repeatedly threatened to do exactly that. As the war grew more difficult, declaring victory anyway and unilaterally ending it without a …
An influential advisor of Donald Trump has claimed Israel may consider using nuclear weapons against Iran should Operation Epic Fury continue for weeks and the country take severe damage. David Sacks, the US President’s czar for artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, made the chilling claim in the All In podcast as he said – seemingly without providing any supporting evidence – about Tel Aviv possibly considering an escalation. There is a worry, Sacks warned, “about Israel escalating the war by contemplating using a nuclear weapon, which would truly be catastrophic.” This suggestion to use nuclear weapons has not been made by any Israeli official. He said: “If this war continues for weeks or months, then Israel could just be destroyed.” According to Sacks, the best option was “de-escalation… involving reaching some sort of cease-fire agreement or some sort of negotiated settlement with Iran.” He is the first US administration official to publicly express concerns about the ongoing conflict and implied that the war needed to end. “We should try to find the off-ramp,” Sacks said, speaking …
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., on Thursday rejected a proposal aimed at ending the Department of Justice’s controversial criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and clearing a path for his successor, Kevin Warsh, to be confirmed. The proposed off-ramp, which has been floated by at least one Republican lawmaker this week, would see the Powell investigation handed off from the DOJ to the Senate Banking Committee. The idea is an attempt to thread a political needle: It would drop the threat of criminal prosecution against Powell – which spurred Tillis, a Banking Committee member, to declare a blockade on Warsh – while still satisfying President Donald Trump, who supports the DOJ probe. But Tillis poured cold water on that proposal Thursday morning. “I’m not going to have an investigation out there,” Tillis told reporters on Capitol Hill. “We have to have an independent Fed. And we can’t finesse this.” Read more CNBC politics coverage “They either need to move forward with a compelling investigation that convinces me I was wrong, or resolve the current …
