I used Claude and NotebookLM together for research and realized they’re solving completely different problems
Research assistance is one area where I rely on LLM-based AI platforms more frequently. Compared to other uses of generative AI, using AI chatbots to help you structure your research and identify connections in your notes creates less tension, especially in academia. These days, however, I don’t use as wide a variety of AI tools for research. Instead, the workflow mainly depends on two solutions: Claude and NotebookLM. I’ll level with you: I didn’t know this optimal combination from the beginning. It actually took me a while to understand that Claude is way better than ChatGPT. Even when I started with the duo, using both tools strategically proved a bigger challenge and required more trial and error than I expected. During this process, I also realized that Claude and NotebookLM are made to solve completely different problems in different ways. Related 6 Reasons I Use Claude Instead of ChatGPT ChatGPT is great; don’t get me wrong. But Claude is so much better. I thought Claude could do it all Why I expected one AI to …








