‘Petulant’ Harry statement after Mail hacking trial was ‘beyond the pale’
Nicole Lampert and Louis Charalambous. Pictures: Submitted. A leading media lawyer called on Prince Harry to apologise after the estranged royal impugned the integrity of the UK’s leading media law judge. Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed all 97 claims of illegal newsgathering brought against Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers by Prince Harry, Sir Elton John, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, David Furnish, Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost and Sir Simon Hughes after a four-year legal battle costing at least £50m. In a statement issued hours after the 436-page judgment was published last week, Harry and Lawrence noted that Mr Justice Nicklin represented Mirror Group Newspapers in previous hacking litigation and that the ruling was “a complete and obvious whitewash”. They also said that the judgment was “inconsistent” with the Mirror case which they said allowed “generic findings about various private investigators”. A separate case brought by Prince Harry against Mirror Group Newspapers, which did not involve Nicklin, resulted in a 2023 finding that the publisher’s journalists used 11 private investigators and their associates “very substantially… in connection with extensive …


