All posts tagged: editor: michael crawford

Green Shoots in the Humanities

Green Shoots in the Humanities

By nearly every measure that can be reasonably assembled—undergraduate majors, tenure-track hires, departmental budgets, public attention—the humanities in the United States have been contracting for more than a decade. Philosophy departments, classics programs, and literature faculties have borne the brunt of this contraction, and the story has become familiar enough that it risks curdling into fatalism. Against that backdrop, it is worth paying attention when something grows. Meleteon is one of those exceptions that is worth highlighting on the APA Blog. It is an online learning platform on which PhD-verified scholars teach live humanities courses—history, classics, theology, literature, philosophy—to adult learners who come to the material on their own time and for their own reasons. The name itself is revealing: it evokes the Greek μελέτη (meletē), meaning care, attention, sustained practice—a word that runs through ancient philosophy from the Stoics to the modern understanding of philosophy as a way of life. The choice also reflects a philosophical stance: that the humanities are not primarily credentials to be earned but disciplines to be practiced. What is interesting …

What Makes Leadership Effective? Balancing the Enduring Tension between Dignity Needs and Human Nature

What Makes Leadership Effective? Balancing the Enduring Tension between Dignity Needs and Human Nature

Throughout history, leadership has shaped the fate of organizations, states, and entire civilizations. Rome cannot be understood apart from Julius Caesar, Augustus, or Nero; China, the U.S. and Britain, and many other nations, still mark political eras by the leaders who defined them. Yet despite the proliferation of leadership theories and analytical methods, one question remains unresolved: what makes leadership effective in a world characterized by uncertainty, complexity, and rapid change? The urgency of this question has grown as technological disruption, mistrust, cultural schisms, geopolitical rivalry, economic interdependence, and social fragmentation place unprecedented demands on leaders across politics, business, and society. The challenge is not simply to identify better managers or more charismatic personalities. It is to understand how leadership creates the conditions under which people, institutions, and societies flourish. Why do some leaders inspire trust, hope, resilience, and innovation while others generate fear, fragmentation, or institutional decline? Why do leadership models that succeed in one context fail in another? And what enduring features of human behavior shape the possibilities and limits of effective leadership? …

Cicero’s New Leadership and the Question of Good Leadership: How Virtue Ethics is Changing Leadership Studies

Cicero’s New Leadership and the Question of Good Leadership: How Virtue Ethics is Changing Leadership Studies

What matters most in leadership? The question has invigorated thinkers from the origins of philosophy—think Plato’s philosopher-kings, Xenophon’s Cyrus, or Mengzi’s enlightened rulers—to today’s most influential scholars of leadership (and pretty much everyone in between). Since the 1970’s, an influential movement in leadership and management theory, drawing on the groundbreaking work of psychologists David McClelland and Richard Boyatzis, has emphasized the critical role of competence in clarifying what makes for good, effective leadership. Relevant skills and tasks can be organized according to job- and role-specific competencies for managing and leading groups of individuals toward desired ends; emotional intelligence has emerged as a popular candidate for categorizing core leadership competencies. Almost concurrent with this rise in emphasis on competence in leadership, however, has been renewed focus and emphasis on the moral and ethical dimensions of leadership. James MacGregor Burns, held by many to be the founder of contemporary Leadership Studies, argued in 1978 in a seminal text that truly transformational leadership “occurs when [leaders and followers] raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation” …

Reflections on Mapping an A–Z Philosophy BlackList

Reflections on Mapping an A–Z Philosophy BlackList

Introduction First launched in 2025 as part of Black History Month programming, the project has grown into what is now titled the A–Z Philosophy BlackList, an expanding intellectual archive that currently features 158 names and counting. Led by Zinhle ka’Nobuhlaluse alongside two Southwestern undergraduate students, Jayden Dawson and Raven Waugh, this list names Black intellectuals whose contributions have informed both philosophy and wider academic fields. While not exhaustive, the list is designed as an invitation to engage with a diverse range of thinkers whose ideas continue to shape knowledge production. Moreover, we acknowledge that any such project reflects the situated perspective of its producers and may inevitably leave some folks out. Importantly, Blackness in this project is framed as a political identity drawing from the South African Black Consciousness philosophy as espoused in Bantu Steve Biko’s I Write What I Like, and N.C. Manganyi’s Being-Black-In-The-World. Each thinker respectively defined Blackness as a political identity, a radical humanism that aimed to reject the idea of blackness as non-white, qua non-human as classified by the Apartheid regime. …

Democratized Speech and the Spread of Social Ills

Democratized Speech and the Spread of Social Ills

How the architecture of online platforms turns ordinary disagreement into something more contagious—and why the virus metaphor only gets us halfway there. Almost everything we know, we learned from someone else’s words. Speech is the oil of social cooperation, the medium through which we coordinate, trust, learn, and disagree. We became the dominant species on this planet not because we are strong or fast, but because we can tell each other things.  Yet the same capacity that built our institutions seems to be eroding them. Trust in governments, journalists, scientists, neighbors, and strangers has frayed. Public discourse fragments into hostile tribes. Conspiracy and grievance circulate at high speed. Ordinary people, not just bad-faith provocateurs, find themselves saying things online they would never say in a room with another human being. How did the medium that made us cooperative become a medium for collective cruelty? The familiar answer points to social media, and it is correct as far as it goes. But it usually mistakes the mechanism. The popular version is essentially viral: bad ideas, like …

Building Online Community and Mutual Membership, Part 2: Pushing the Peanut Forward; Why Our Supportive Work-In-Progress Group Is Still Going After Eight Years

Building Online Community and Mutual Membership, Part 2: Pushing the Peanut Forward; Why Our Supportive Work-In-Progress Group Is Still Going After Eight Years

The Diversity and Inclusiveness Beat is running a two-part mini-series titled “Building Online Community and Mutual Mentorship.” This mini-series is co-authored by Cheryl Frazier (College of Southern Maryland), Jeremy Fried (College of Southern Maryland), Stephanie Holt (Wofford College), Sherri Irvin (University of Oklahoma), Babak M. Khoshroo (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), and Camilla Palazzolo (University of Genoa), all of whom belong to a work-in-progress group that has been running successfully for eight years. All have research interests in various aspects of aesthetics, including bodily beauty, aesthetic agency and incarceration, philosophy of music, AI and creativity, contemporary art, pop culture and intellectual property, and the connection between aesthetics and justice. This post is the second and final installment. Giving and receiving feedback can be a vulnerable process. Writing is deeply personal, and it takes great trust to share your work with the world. Yet, this is a vital part of philosophy and academia more broadly—whether while developing and defending a dissertation, submitting manuscripts and putting on a brave face as you read through Reviewer 2’s comments, or …

Building Online Community and Mutual Membership, Part 2: Pushing the Peanut Forward; Why Our Supportive Work-In-Progress Group Is Still Going After Eight Years

Building Online Community and Mutual Mentorship, Part 1: 5 Practical Tips to Revolutionize Your Work-in-Progress Groups

The Diversity and Inclusiveness Beat is running a two-part mini-series titled “Building Online Community and Mutual Mentorship.” This mini-series is co-authored by Cheryl Frazier (College of Southern Maryland), Jeremy Fried (College of Southern Maryland), Stephanie Holt (Wofford College), Sherri Irvin (University of Oklahoma), Babak M. Khoshroo (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), and Camilla Palazzolo (University of Genoa), all of whom belong to a work-in-progress group that has been running successfully for eight years. All have research interests in various aspects of aesthetics, including bodily beauty, aesthetic agency and incarceration, philosophy of music, AI and creativity, contemporary art, pop culture and intellectual property, and the connection between aesthetics and justice. This post is the first installment. Finding consistent, productive, and enjoyable ways to get feedback on works in progress, particularly in primarily online spaces, can be difficult. As seen with the recent cancellation of the APA’s pilot virtual meetings, reduction in hybrid/online conferences, and (anecdotally) the general vibe whenever there’s an online event, people seem averse to adding any more looking-at-people-in-boxes-on-a-screen into their lives. Yet, there are …

Between Traditions: Korean Philosophy and the Limits of Universality—Interview with Ph.D. Student Will Gilbert

Between Traditions: Korean Philosophy and the Limits of Universality—Interview with Ph.D. Student Will Gilbert

From: https://pixabay.com/photos/korea-seoul-palace-traditional-3978354/ The research of William Gilbert focuses on Korean Daoism, religious syncretism, and comparative philosophy—areas that remain underdeveloped even within the growing field of Korean philosophy. Doctoral Student at Sogang University in Seoul, South Korea, he is completing a dissertation on Korean Neo-Daoism in the Goryeo dynasty under the supervision of Professor Halla Kim. In 2024, he became the first Westerner to graduate with an M.A. in Korean philosophy from Sungkyunkwan University. His thesis examined questions of cosmogony in the writings of the Goryeo dynasty (918–1392) poet-philosopher Yi Gyubo through a comparative Daoist lens. He has presented at numerous international conferences across South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Italy, and the United States. Alongside his research, he serves as an editorial assistant on two forthcoming Oxford and Routledge volumes on Korean philosophy, and co-produced several publicly available online courses introducing Korean philosophy to general audiences. His broader aim is to help build the infrastructure this field still lacks, translations, introductory resources, and comparative scholarship that takes Korean philosophy seriously on its own terms. Could you …

The Honesty Crisis | Blog of the APA

The Honesty Crisis | Blog of the APA

Free Wiki pic Honesty is under a lot of pressure today in areas of society ranging from politics to religion to celebrity culture to education. But honesty is also incredibly valuable and important. So it is worth doing what we can to try to protect against further erosion of this virtue. Or so I argue in my new book, The Honesty Crisis: Preserving Our Most Cherished Virtue in an Increasingly Dishonest World. Here I summarize some of the main claims I defend in the book, and invite readers to consider taking a deeper dive. More specifically, we will touch on why honesty matters, what honesty even is, and some areas where there is an ongoing honesty crisis.  The Value of Honesty Honesty is indeed valuable. It helps to show respect for others, to treat them as persons with dignity, and to demonstrate that we value their autonomy. Honesty promotes trust and credibility, and prevents harm. It also fosters healthy relationships, and strengthens organizations and societies. Empirically, increased honesty is related to decreased aggression, higher GPA, and …

Copyediting and Philosophy, Part 3: Language, Power, and Copyediting

Copyediting and Philosophy, Part 3: Language, Power, and Copyediting

The Issues in Philosophy Beat is running a three-part mini-series called “Copyediting and Philosophy,” which focuses on issues around copyediting relevant to the philosophy profession: what it is, how to navigate it as an author, and philosophical questions it raises. This post is the third and final installment. Copyeditors are enforcers of a particular kind, even if they are not the originators of the norms they’re enforcing. Still, we might worry that the practice of copyediting could enforce standard Englishes to the exclusion of other registers and dialects in a pernicious way. Jessica Flanigan, for instance, argues that linguistic pedantry and an overemphasis on conformity with spelling and grammar perpetuates social hierarchies. And a few years ago, an essay by a former copyeditor, Helen Betya Rubinstein, argued that copyediting is a white supremacist project.  I think it’s important to pay attention to prejudices that attach to different varieties of English, whether these be registers, dialects, or “world” or “global” Englishes. At the same time, I think copyediting can be a way to facilitate communication, especially …