All posts tagged: Guarding

A Lesson for Guarding the Presidential Line of Succession

A Lesson for Guarding the Presidential Line of Succession

In the chaotic swirl of events after President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, doctors feared that Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson had suffered a heart attack upon arrival at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. The signs were ominous: Johnson’s face was ashen, and he was clutching his chest. “There was the real possibility that the No. 3 in the line of succession would become president,” the historian Michael Beschloss told me. Johnson was reportedly examined and a heart attack ruled out—but not before then–House Speaker John McCormack was told that he might be the next president. The declaration prompted a severe bout of vertigo in the 71-year-old. Few moments in history have so starkly exposed the vulnerabilities of the presidential line of succession—or the lack of clarity about how it is protected. Last night provided another illustration of them. If events at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner had gone differently, a gunman who breached security at the Washington Hilton could have reached a ballroom containing an unusually dense cluster of American power. The president and …

Guarding Women’s Freedom, Protecting Everyone’s Rights: Why Humanists Must Keep Church and State Separate

Guarding Women’s Freedom, Protecting Everyone’s Rights: Why Humanists Must Keep Church and State Separate

Matilda Joslyn Gage Women’s History Month is a time to honor not only the women whose names appear in our textbooks, but also those whose courage helped define the very boundaries of a just democracy. One such figure is Matilda Joslyn Gage, a suffragist and radical thinker who saw with remarkable clarity that women’s freedom—and the freedom of all marginalized people—depends on keeping government power separate from religious authority. At a moment when religious groups were lobbying for a “Christian Amendment” to declare the United States a Christian nation, Gage recognized that such a fusion of church and state would undermine fairness, equality, and basic rights, especially for women and Indigenous peoples. For the Boulder Humanist Chapter of the American Humanist Association, Gage’s legacy speaks directly to our core principles. She understood that when government endorses or enforces religious doctrine, it is not morality that is elevated—it is inequality. Attempts in her era to abolish divorce, grounded in religious dogma, would have locked women into abusive and economically dependent marriages. Today, we see the same …