Kalshi challenges Times report amid widening prediction market regulatory battles
Kalshi is disputing a New York Times report about the expanding legal and political battle over prediction markets, including questions about sports betting, taxes, consumer safeguards and federal intervention. The company responded August 27 as 20 states face active litigation involving Kalshi or other prediction markets. Separately, 44 states signed a letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission arguing the platforms have sidestepped state regulation and taxes. “The New York Times asked a series of questions, then ignored almost every answer that didn’t align with the narrative that was being pushed,” Kalshi said in its response. The New York Times published a story today about prediction markets. They asked us a series of questions, then ignored almost every answer that didn’t align with the narrative that was being pushed. So we’re sharing our answers below. https://t.co/j6TAYNWiGN — robertjdenault (@robertjdenault) August 27, 2026 The Times cited a Tax Foundation estimate that states could collect at least $2 billion annually by taxing prediction markets like sportsbooks. Kalshi questioned the estimate and pointed to North Carolina, where online …








