Some 300 miles north of Vancouver, nestled among the rocky bays and forests of the HaĂÉ«zaqv Nation, a wilyââ gray wolf helps itself to a snack. On its own, this isnât remarkable and happens all the time. But a wild wolf swimming to a buoy, reeling it in, and then pulling an underwater trap to shore before eating the bait? Thatâs an altogether new phenomenon, one that scientists argue could qualify as tool useâsomething never before documented in wolves.
The astonishing video was recently included in a study recerntly publishedin the journal Ecology and Evolution. Within a swift three minutes, the wolfâs work was done and their meal finished. But does the canineâs clever move qualify as tool use? The studyâs authors say it may come down to how you define tool use.Â
How the wolf was caught on camera
Members of the HaĂÉ«zaqv Nation initially set up the traps to capture the invasive European green crabs that wreak havoc on the local ecosystem. But they soon found that the traps were being dragged to shore, broken into, and left empty: It seemed something was making off with the bait.
To catch the culprit, they set up cameras around the traps. The very next day, they had their answer. Around 9 p.m. on May 29, 2024, a clever gray wolf was recorded swimming out to the buoy, carrying it to shore, then pulling on the buoyâs rope to reel in the trap before quickly devouring the bait.
Which actions count as tool use is an ongoing debate among scientists, and this latest example is no exception. If this wolf actually used a tool comes down to the definition of tool use.Â
In their study, authors Kyle Artelle, an environmental biologist at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, and Paul Paquet, a biologist and wolf expert, write, âtool use is typically understood as using an external object to achieve a specific goal with intentâa definition argued to include even stick chewing by dogs.â This definition would seemingly include rope pulling as tool use.
However, other definitions wouldnât say this is tool use. These exclude rope pulling, because the animal isnât the one procuring or manipulating the rope. If, for instance, the wolf had tied and pulled the rope itself, then this instance would qualify as tool useâeven using this more selective definition.Â
Artelle and Paquet, argue that, âthe sophistication of this particular sequence might suggest an exception to the rope pulling exclusionâas might the fact that pulling the rope is the key mechanism for retrieving crab traps even by humans.â
So, in short, the debate rages on. But, regardless of whether or not this is considered tool use, no one is denying that this wolf is one clever canine.
