An encyclopedia formed from AI hallucinations – what could go wrong?
Feedback is New Scientist’s popular sideways look at the latest science and technology news. You can submit items you believe may amuse readers to Feedback by emailing feedback@newscientist.com Just a hallucination The online encyclopedias are proliferating. While Wikipedia still dominates, there are plenty of others, like the spectacularly nerdy Memory Alpha, which contains all you could ever want to know about Star Trek. Elon Musk has Grokipedia, a partly AI-generated site that purports to correct Wikipedia’s supposed biases, and in doing so is frequently incorrect. Into this fray enters Halupedia. It is truly unique: it is 100 per cent AI-generated and all of the entries are hallucinations. If you request an article, the site will generate it and then store it indefinitely. Nothing on Halupedia is accurate, except by accident. Hence the site has a page for “The Great Pigeon Census of 1887“, apparently “an ambitious, if ultimately misguided, undertaking by the Royal Society for Avian Enumeration (RSFE) to meticulously count every gold-crested rock dove within the administrative boundaries of the United Kingdom of Great …







